Tunisia continues to be at a crossroads despite tangible improvements in security conditions that went crescendo since the televised debate with Prime Minister of the transitional government.
Let's hope it lasts that side. Because the risks of further slippage no longer be ruled out. These include, sporadic incidents in some parts of the country's interior and other tensions and skirmishes on the border with Libya and in refugee camps in southern Iraq.
Be mentioned, especially, new uncertainties accompanying the final release of the Ministry of Defence announced the continuation of legal proceedings against Farhat Rajhi.
Indeed, everyone is aware of the likely impact of such a decision of the National Army.
We believe, on our part, that if the Army wants to go through with this case "Rajhi," she must be, logically and necessarily his reasons and it believes that many revelations, could adversely affect the country and the interests of Tunisia, would be expected.
Because it does not back a portion of the population, who could still believe the nonsense of Mister Rajhi, and the body of the Judicial and Bar, just a matter of principle.
On the other hand, if the political, common ground seems to be reached between the transitional government and the president of various commissions that speak to how: "I decided not recommended ..." as had the audacity to claim Kamel Jendoubi.
However, if we do not doubt the integrity of Mr. Jendoubi, it is worth remembering that nothing of an independent person as he wants to believe, since it is known to have been , for many years, leader of the extremist left "Ech-chool" close POCT. Do not forget that Mr. Jendoubi and members of his committee have been elected by the Forum for the top goals of the revolution, political reform and democratic transition and whose members were appointed Chairman.
The transitional government has, so far, wisely and responsibly deal with these two Commissions, placing each time, the best interests of Tunisia over any personal consideration.
Economically, this is where the shoe pinches. The challenges are many and the divisions remain. Domestically, social conflicts in several businesses - not least - and last are whole, some of them long ago.
The most significant and most absurd is the clutch in Tunisie Telecom for nearly a month without any sign of solution will be born. On the one hand, the union maintains its requirements for dismissal of 63 senior executives, called "big bucks" and the other the UAE, which holds 35% stake in the company, or 3.5 billion dinars, categorically refuse yield.
The arm wrestling moves, so in time. A strike that will remain in the annals of trade unionism in the sense that no one calls for better wages, but the dismissal of "big bucks". Worse, some contractors have been physically assaulted, while several employees holding regularly threatened and intimidated when speaking of their desire to return to work and save the company and in that case, break the strike.
However, we would like to know if the trade unionist who leads the way, is well aware of the amount of losses it has caused to the company? An independent expert would do well to indicate the huge sums due to the shortfall during that month strike that lasts.
This is the first time the business premises were closed by the regional directors and heads of ACTEL sounds sensible, so they open and respect the freedom of employees who want to fulfill their sacred duty and right to work.
Meanwhile, this release makes the happiness of Tunisie Telecom's competitors is losing ground that it would be too difficult to catch.
But with the postponement of elections to the Constituent Assembly, and the future - hopefully by October 16 - a Constituent Assembly (ie temporary), a new interim president and a other government, still tentative, the country will move in the interim and it will, at least one to two years.
This provisional status, in which Tunisia has committed itself, can not, under any circumstances, inspire complete confidence in the economic and foreign countries that promise small wonders if all goes well.
One wonders whether the country has done well to choose this approach. Or it would, perhaps, had better go directly to an amended constitution and submitted to a referendum with parliamentary and presidential elections?
In any case, political parties and several activists of human rights have chosen the option of a complete break with the past - an approach to some and expensive, however, understandable - with all the advantages it offers in terms of establishment, entry and once for all, a democratic process is 100% reliable.
But this comes at the expense of economic risk to float for a long time. This means that it is not as easy to decide. Should he do, like Egypt that has amended the constitution and held elections in September while avoiding the social and professional turmoil, which earned him the trust of financial powers such as Saudi Arabia has released presto $ 4.5 billion, pending the colossal aid promised by the G8?
Or to focus on the political side by requiring, first setting up a flawless system in the field, but with real risks of economic recession?
It is true that the context is not quite the same in Egypt and Tunisia, but here, political parties, especially small and new, have managed to impose their rule and dictate what line to take in the tiniest details.
0 comments:
Post a Comment